Sign in with your E-Mail & Password

Log in to view your personalized notifications across Scified!

Alien Discussion Forums
Is Ripley a 'compensatory' character that allows Scott's Alien to unleash unconscious rage against 'Mother'?

Is Ripley a 'compensatory' character that allows Scott's Alien to unleash unconscious rage against 'Mother'?

5,781 Views28 RepliesAdd A Reply
Forum Topic


OvomorphMember49 XPJul-28-2017 5:57 AM

I’ve been thinking about this for a while now.


What makes Alien so fascinating is its blend of body-horror, erotic imagery, and themes of penetration and violation. Amid this ****tail, one of the most famous of movie heroines survives, keeps her honour, kills the monster.


But why is the computer called ‘Mother’? Why does Ripley rage ‘you *****!’ when the computer won’t reverse the self-destruct sequence? And what is it the monster does, what is the only thing it does? It devours, penetrates, ‘rapes’, destroys.


If I were a psychoanalyst I would say that the Ripley character – whose position is fundamentally the same as Shaw and Daniels in Prometheus and A: Covenant – is the acceptable face of femininity, whose body is chaste, unviolated, and whose dignity is portrayed as almost sacred (David Fincher’s Alien3 draws on this with its final images of Crucifiction and Virgin-Child). It is the compensatory fantasy, that allows the movie to express something else, something darker.


Beneath this lurks the destructive, matricidal rage that gives the movie its disturbing, fascinating energy. This energy lurks in the shadows, it ambushes its victims while remaining hidden. It is a phantasmic, unconscious rage, that can also be said to be a wish to ‘have’ the mother, to incorporate her, to ‘eat’ her, to bring her into the body of the devourer.


All of this, I think, is what makes the scene near the end, when Ripley undresses and climbs into the Spacesuit, a shocking and erotic moment. Everywhere else in the movie, she is fully dressed, non-sexualized, demure. Suddenly, it is not only the monster who is aroused, showing his stiff inner jaw, dripping with liquid. The viewer is also drawn into a state of arousal, and this threatens to break apart the narrative logic, that ‘Ripley’ is sacred, untouchable, virgin-like and destined to defeat the horrid Id-monster. The viewer has not been allowed to desire her until this moment. But now, briefly, the audience becomes like the xenomorph: we want to ‘have’ her, devour her, destroy her. Ripley singing a lullably like a little girl only gives the scene more charge, makes it more troubling.


And suddenly, Ripley penetrates the xeno with a bolt, and triumphs. The moment is passed, the audience is lulled with peaceful music, and we forget that, for a moment there, we sat on the shoulder of the monster, wanting what it wanted, looking that way it was looking. Interestingly, from a logical point of view, the monster could not see what we were seeing inside the booth where Ripley was undressing, and yet it showed us its ‘erection’. At that moment, the xeno was expressing the point of view of the audience, not its own.


What do you think? This may be a controversial idea, and I’m sure not everyone will agree, but I would like to know what you venerable people think. . .

thoughts of murnau

28 Responses to Is Ripley a 'compensatory' character that allows Scott's Alien to unleash unconscious rage against 'Mother'?


NeomorphMember1984 XPJul-28-2017 11:25 AM

Very Freudian.


PraetorianMember3378 XPJul-28-2017 2:20 PM

Wow, your lines are poetry, I think.


OvomorphMember49 XPJul-28-2017 2:29 PM

Thanks Ati - and yes, Freudian nakedlunch, but I don't take that as a negative thing. To say 'Freudian' seems to knock my ideas into a box, as if to say 'that's over there, I've named it, it needn't trouble us anymore'. But the questions, the themes in Alien (and A:C) are still there, larger than life, and it's worth thinking about them, and how they relate to our pleasure as we watch. If they weren't there, the Alien franchise would be boring and meh. What Giger did with his creature, and what Scott did with Alien, is to weave these hidden desires, fears, horrors and taboos into the visual and movie medium, for us to dine upon, be entertained and provoked by. Giger and Alien is in the realm of the obscene, transgressive desire, that lives within all of us. We are the Aliens really. . . .

thoughts of murnau


PraetorianStaff2414 XPJul-28-2017 3:41 PM

wow very well written, articulate and thought provoking thread! A very interesting read murnau!! Upvoted 


PraetorianMember3378 XPJul-28-2017 4:06 PM

'At that moment, the xeno was expressing the point of view of the audience, not its own.' -- Exciting thought, more than exciting...

'Ripley penetrates the xeno with a bolt, and triumphs. The moment is passed, the audience is lulled with peaceful music, and we forget that, for a moment there, we sat on the shoulder of the monster, wanting what it wanted, looking that way it was looking.'

murnau - Believe it or not, at the end of the movie when the xeno is falling out of the Narcissus shuttlecraft, I always feel that I am together with the monster. Not on its shoulder, but I am the monster. :) Of course, it is because of the editing and others may feel the same but the act of throwing out is so real. Yeah, don't analyse that, please. :)

I should add that I do not feel anything towards the xeno, there is no sympathy at all! And I'd like to stress that I don't like the second part of Alien at all. I LOVE the first half of it, but the second half is not for me. Perhaps these two things are connected, that's why the end of the movie seems to be uncomfortable.

Two interesting/relevant things:

Probably you know that the script of Alien was put together from two main storylines, we see two movies in one.

Ridley Scott originally wanted to kill Ripley at the end of the movie, that would have been a totally different version of the triumph you mention...

Lawrence of Arabia

ChestbursterMember936 XPJul-28-2017 4:15 PM

Love your analysis especially the last part regarding Ripley and Xeno. Very well put. Kudos :)

"The trick, William Potter, is not minding that it hurts."


PraetorianMember3378 XPJul-28-2017 4:26 PM

Lawrence of Arabia - What do you feel at the end of Alien? :)

Lawrence of Arabia

ChestbursterMember936 XPJul-28-2017 4:38 PM

I liked it. I really enjoyed seeing Weaver in those tiny panties and the crotch shots lol Scotts original ending sounds amazing though.

"The trick, William Potter, is not minding that it hurts."

Dr. Curt Connors

ChestbursterMember661 XPJul-28-2017 8:28 PM

I never found Sigourney Beaver, sorry Weaver, attractive until Alien 3 with a shaved head. Is that weird? Never found her attractive in Alien, Aliens, or Ghostbusters 1 and 2. Yeah those crotch shots with that thick b**h, haha. This thread is dirty and I feel violated, just kidding. Great article by the way.


PraetorianStaff2414 XPJul-28-2017 9:12 PM

Dr. Curt Connors i totally agree, perhaps it was the '80s perm. The shaved head really suited her, and her look in Resurrection was also very strong but feminine. There is real strength and determination in her eyes.

Daniels and even Shaw were too doe-eyed for me. Bring in Katee Sackhoff as the next lead!!!

Dr. Curt Connors

ChestbursterMember661 XPJul-28-2017 9:31 PM

@lRaptus   Katee Sackhoff, hell yeah, yes please! Her in Battlestar and Riddick! I think you just cast the new Alien movie female lead, if there is another one. And yeah I think you are 100% right about the perm.


PraetorianMember3378 XPJul-28-2017 9:55 PM

'I never found Sigourney Beaver, sorry Weaver, attractive until Alien 3 with a shaved head. Is that weird?'

Not weird at all. Probably that is your fetish. Observe your childhood and you can find its root. :)

Lawrence of Arabia

ChestbursterMember936 XPJul-29-2017 12:06 AM

I also found Weaver attractive in Alien 3, I love my women tough lol I've never found her cute till I watched Alien XD and yes IRaptus! Her resurrection look was badass. I do disagree about the doey eye girls, Weaver was one in 79 and, idk, cute girls being tough gets me :P

"The trick, William Potter, is not minding that it hurts."


PraetorianStaff2414 XPJul-29-2017 1:40 AM

Lawrence of Arabia no worries mate. I like Katherine Waterston as an actress and hope that she continues in the Alien franchise, and be allowed to grow into the next steely-eyed heroine like Weaver lol. But until then, bring in Katee Sackhoff


OvomorphMember49 XPJul-29-2017 4:11 PM

Thanks for all the replies, and for the upvote! A fun conversation . . .


I’ve always found Weaver impressive, feminine but with androgynous characteristics, complex, elegant, intelligent, **** as one part of her 3 dimensional persona. I think she was miscast in Ghostbusters, and too intelligent for B Murray’s smug clowning (watched it recently – Venkman would be done for sexual harassment these days, he doesn’t hear ‘no’ when she says ‘no’).


It interests me that the replies here are comfortable joking around with beaver/weaver but not comfortable acknowledging any of this topic’s ideas about aggressive, destructive desire, symbolized by the xeno. It’s as if the xeno is both visible and invisible, the horrid elephant in the room, so to speak. We all know it’s there, and our conspiracy of silence fills the space around it.


Fascinating that you see yourself as the monster falling, Ati. That’s probably personal imaginative stuff that places you there. Thanks for sharing. I haven’t looked at that scene in that way, though I’ve noticed that the moment of the expulsion/fall is a repeated moment, shown from different angles in succession – it is a kind of ‘frozen moment’, the part of the dream that keeps coming back to us.


I did know that Ridley wanted Ripley (Ridley/Ripley?) to die at the end in an earlier draft. I’m not sure what you mean by 2 movies spliced together, though, Ati. If she had died, we might not be talking about the movie after all these years. In my thoughts, Ripley being killed was ultimately unbearable for Scott because – in the dream logic I’ve sketched – that would mean that the destructive rage wins, and the guilt of that is too much. The strong compensatory female figure allows the rage to run riot, but must be suppressed at the end of the dream. Strangely, as Ripley goes to sleep in the escape pod, we the audience ‘wake up’, exit the movie/dream, safe in the knowledge that the monster has, for now, been put down. It sits there in the box, until the next movie, or the next time we watch. We want the monster to burn and rage, just as we want Ripley/Shaw/Daniels to put it back in the box for us.


The scenes in A3 and Covenant that show the point-of-view of the xeno are mistakes, I think. The xeno is empty, it is the absent space where our own dangerous horrors and urges take root. You could say that we are put inside the monster for a moment, seeing through its eyes, but this is too strong an identification, too conscious. The xeno is so extreme that we cannot sit inside it. It is totally ‘other’ – it is us, but can never be experienced by us in our waking life.

thoughts of murnau


OvomorphMember49 XPJul-29-2017 4:13 PM

btw, check out my new film blog 'thoughts of murnau' on wordpress - review of A:C and Spiderman:Homecoming on there. . .

thoughts of murnau


PraetorianStaff2414 XPJul-29-2017 4:50 PM

murnau its funny you mention the conspiracy of silence around what the xenomorph represents. To me the xenomorph is the metaphoric opposite to the idiom of the elephant in the room.  Whereas the elephant represents a large conspicuous problem that society does not wish to address, and is happy to sweep under the rug; such as social diseases like substance abuse, domestic violence, lust for the flesh, Sexual fetishes etc.

The Xenomorph is the lurking black spider that secretly wishes to embrace and indulge such desires. That is why you never really get a look at the beast in ALIEN, because no-one wants to see their demons in full, and in the light, and acknowledge its presence as a whole.

And perhaps that is why we skirt around the topics you mention, but joke about it lightheartedly instead?   

You are totally correct about Weaver being miscast in Ghostbusters. That role did not do her justice. 


PraetorianMember3378 XPJul-29-2017 7:23 PM

'though I’ve noticed that the moment of the expulsion/fall is a repeated moment, shown from different angles in succession – it is a kind of ‘frozen moment’, the part of the dream that keeps coming back to us.' - by murnau

Perfect description of the scene! If I'm not mistaken that is the only scene in the movie where we see moments in slow motion building meaning with the help of rain/water (they used water in the scene)=death, falling=death, darkness=death - echoed in Scott's Blade Runner well-known Roy Batty scene from the end of the movie where Batty is dying, it is raining, and dream-like slow motion is used.


TrilobiteMember8212 XPJul-29-2017 8:51 PM

To the OP- Great posts on this question! I never thought of Ripley that way until Resurrection when she  made inuendos toward the crew. She was never sexed up and so that's how I saw her- I think everyone watched that climbing into the suit scene a few times. In fact, I recall less than a year ago one or two members were posting close ups of...umm....oh....what we now might call granny panties.

Dr. Curt Connors

ChestbursterMember661 XPJul-30-2017 7:16 AM

@murnau  You're welcome


ChestbursterMember907 XPJul-30-2017 7:30 AM

@murnau I think you make some fantastic observations on human nature. I remember as a pre teen feeling some of those EXACT feelings---although I wouldn't say "mother" had anything to do with them---but the "Alien" as a sexual metaphor and a "violator" certainly was/is a longstanding and poignant one.


OvomorphMember49 XPAug-01-2017 8:21 AM

iRaptus: 'The Xenomorph is the lurking black spider that secretly wishes to embrace and indulge such desires. That is why you never really get a look at the beast in ALIEN, because no-one wants to see their demons in full, and in the light, and acknowledge its presence as a whole.'

Interesting ideas, iRaptus, and thanks for replying. I think the beast is operating in different ways in the movie, and in a discussion like this. It may be operating differently from the ‘elephant in the room’ in the movie, where yes it is a manifestation of violent, forbidden urges to devour and destroy, that are ‘secret’ as you say, because the creature lurks in the dark and ambushes when you are looking the other way, and is never fully seen. But in this discussion, and in other circles, I stick to the idea that is the ‘elephant’ – it is in plain sight, we have seen (over and over, as fans) what it does, and how in Alien, and now A:C, it is clearly linked to angry impulses toward Mother/the feminine – but it is not being discussed as such. Perhaps this is inevitable, and of course, this is what (good) movies are for, to express parts of the human experience that are not easily approached or admitted to.

Loving this thread btw! It just shows how intelligent us fan boys can be, when we keep the discussion polite and deep-thinking. And good words from Starlogger, thanks for your cool observations. Alien really is one of the deepest movies for me, it is so rich, and never stops giving. It is art-house and blockbuster, mood-piece and horror slasher.

Blade Runner must be my next thread – lots to say on that!

thoughts of murnau


ChestbursterMember907 XPAug-01-2017 8:37 AM

@murnau (love the name, btw!) "Alien" is, to me, the best Horror and the best Science Fiction movie of all-time. I can never imagine it being topped. It is, as you say, so deep and dark and there are just so many layers in stands up to time and multiple viewings very well, never appearing "hokey" or dated. Just a fantastic film in so many ways. I could watch it a bazillion fact, I may have!


ChestbursterMember899 XPAug-01-2017 9:05 AM

Sorry murnau but I would not include Shaw in the same category. She is no "virgin", she has sex with Halloway, she does not run from the space "dickhead". Further more we "have" probably for years before giving birth to many "bastards" like us. Sorry I still don't understand why did she have the most horrific death in the franchise. So that woman should not trust men, that naivety story again?


OvomorphMember49 XPAug-01-2017 9:19 AM

Thanks Starlogger – I agree!


You’re right Red0guy, Shaw is a bit different, as Prometheus is different. There is no xeno in it (Deacon aside), but the creatures in it do show erotic-genital features of both sexes. Yes, she is sexually active too, which is anomalous (Ripley in A3 aside, too, I’m only talking about Scott’s Alien movies). But her insemination is a violation by David, and so she is, like Ripley, the victim of male/’alien’ violence in Prometheus. She prevails in Prometheus, but remains under threat. Her disgusting mutilation is the most disturbing part of A:C for me, even as it restores the central horror theme of Scott’s Alien. This theme revolves around male creation, a theme common to Alien & Blade Runner. The male characters wish to supplant ‘Mother’, they want to claim her gift of creation for their own. The other element to this is a ‘rage’ against ‘Mother’, involving the wish to destroy, devour, ‘have’ her as her gifts are taken from her. That is why David experiments upon her, claims to love and mourn her, and yet keeps her mutilated body on display. His pleasure at seeing her pulled apart is what makes the scenes in the lab so disturbing.

thoughts of murnau


OvomorphMember49 XPAug-01-2017 9:58 AM

It might be said that the weaker presence of these horror/sex/creation/agression themes in Prometheus is (partly) behind the disappointment expressed by so many fans. Other reasons given, such as the sketchy characterisation, don't seem so convincing to me. The characters in Alien are sketches, although much better sketches....

thoughts of murnau

Lawrence of Arabia

ChestbursterMember936 XPAug-01-2017 11:11 AM

murnau Isn't it established in Aliens that Ripley had a daughter? So she isn't a technical virgin per se either lol


I agree with everything you're saying though :)

"The trick, William Potter, is not minding that it hurts."


OvomorphMember49 XPAug-02-2017 4:04 AM

That's Cameron's Aliens, which I'm not discussing, and also that's a plot detail that's happened offscreen. What's important is the way in which a character functions within the narrative flow, and within the economy of ideas, events and images that happens in real-time. A movie is like a dream, made by many hands of course, but all involved belong to the same moment in history and (mostly) to the same culture, which means they will make something that either reflects or, more rarely, challenges the values of the culture within whose forces it is made. Personal issues, such as the agressivity I've been talking about, belong to the individual, yes, but are also shared by many others since we are all human minds/bodies with shared impulses and psychologies. These impulses make the culture around us too, and so cultural themes are often personal ones, and vice versa.

Good point though! In Aliens the threat is to the nuclear family. In Alien the threat is darker, wilder, more obscene and more erotic. That's what makes it horror, while Aliens is action, and satire, and adventure. Damn fine action, oh yes, but a different beast to Alien.

thoughts of murnau

Add A Reply
Log in to Post
Enter Your E-Mail
Enter Your Password

Stay Logged In
Scified Network
Godzilla-Movies.comHosted Community
JurassicWorld3.netHosted Community
Alien-Covenant.comHosted Community
Hosted Community
Predator4-Movie.comHosted Community
New Alien: Covenant Forum Topics
Highest Forum Ranks Unlocked
80% To Next Rank
87% To Next Rank
77% To Next Rank
63% To Next Rank
39% To Next Rank
Latest Alien Fandom Activity
Get this Prometheus sweater!
Alien Sweater

Alien: Covenant is a sequel to 2012's Prometheus as well as a prequel to 1979's ALIEN. Alien fans looking to know more about Alien: Covenant should check back often. is an information resource for film enthusiasts looking to learn more about the upcoming blockbuster Alien: Covenant. Providing the latest official and accurate information on Alien: Covenant, this website contains links to every set video, viral video, commercial, trailer, poster, movie still and screenshot available. This site is an extension of the Alien & Predator Fandom on Scified - a central hub for fans of Alien and Prometheus looking to stay up-to-date on the latest news. Images used are property of their respective owners. Alien: Covenant, Prometheus and its associated names, logos and images are property of 20th Century Fox and are in no way owned by Scified and its related entities. This is a fan-created website for the purpose of informing and exciting fans for Alien: Covenant's release. If you have any questions about this site, its content or the Scified Network in general, feel free to contact Scified directly.

Scified is an entertainment media network covering the latest news on the most popular, upcoming science fiction movies, games and television. All content is property of unless otherwise stated. Images and names of content we promote, discuss, review or report are property of their respective owners. Scified is independantly owned and operated by a team of dedicated sci-fi movie fans, who strive to provide the best information and community experience for other like-minded sci-fi movie enthusiasts.

© 2022