oceantracks
MemberOvomorphMay-19-2017 7:15 PMOK so David had to cut his hair to be more like his "twin."
They show him cutting his hair in broad hacks.
Before you know it, his hair is neatly cut just like Walter's.
How'd he do that? Oh OK, more suspension of disbelief required ;)
oceantracks
MemberOvomorphMay-19-2017 7:58 PMReally anxious to read the reactions of Friday night, and the whole weekend, audiences here in the US....
splatterpunk
MemberFacehuggerMay-19-2017 8:03 PMThe only thing I really care about is the film makes enough money so we can watch the next one. Hopefully the next one answers the questions and we are all happy:)
oceantracks
MemberOvomorphMay-19-2017 8:05 PMIt already made over 40 million worldwide before US release, I don't think it will be a problem. Didn't cost much to make...98 million or something?
joylitt
MemberNeomorphMay-19-2017 8:05 PMThere is a lot of negativity for sure. This is one of the funniest reviews on imdb:
Fassbender didn't jerk off this much in Shame
3/10
Author: emily-foley
18 May 2017
This whole movie is just Michael Fassbender reciting 1800s poetry to Michael Fassbender. This movie is 7 minutes of good CGI and 2 hours of rolling your eyes.
oceantracks
MemberOvomorphMay-19-2017 8:11 PMI think one of it's biggest problems was construction. The 2nd act just couldn't live up to ACT ONE, which was amazing. The pace dropped to almost a standstill in the second act.
By the time the long, slow ACT TWO was over, there wasn't much time left back on the ship to do much but end it. Now that was true of ALIENS as well, but ALIENS was constructed so that ACT ONE was all build up, ACT TWO was insanity, and ACT THREE was more insanity. Once the rollercoaster got going, it didn't stop.
In this film, the coaster gets going, stops, then gets going for ten more minutes.
It is what it is. I'm glad it's out there, and may go again.
